Compare Codex, Claude Code, and Cursor in plain language. Choose based on speed, team use, and editor preference while Makru keeps the setup itself steady.
Codex fits best when you work solo or want the fastest path into a first project without much team overhead.
Claude Code works best when shared context, handover, and team use matter more than shaving minutes off the very first hour.
Cursor makes sense for editor-first teams that want to stay inside an IDE, while still keeping a clear start around that editor.
Makru keeps the starting point steady. This page helps buyers choose the tool that fits their team, their speed, and the way they like to work.
Quick answer: choose Codex if speed matters most, Claude Code if several people need the same shared start, and Cursor if your team mainly lives in the editor.
No. The same package works with Codex, Claude Code, and Cursor.
Not as a zero-skill promise. Starter works if you can follow one clear first route on your own. Guided setup is there for teams that want help with that first start.
Yes. You can keep the same core setup even when you change tools later.
Go to checkout, or use guided setup if you want help with the first setup.
