Teams still choosing between Codex, Claude Code, and Cursor
Every tool change felt like a reset and created chaos in the first setup.
More confidence when testing tools and less wasted time when switching.
Relevant if you want to try multiple tools without rebuilding your whole starting point.
The situation
A team wanted to test multiple AI coding tools, but every change made the first setup feel unclear again. Each new tool felt like a reset.
What changed
Makru 0->100 kept the starting point stable:
- the same delivery flow
- the same first route
- the same core starting point
- only the tool choice changes where needed
Result
The team could compare tools without turning every test into new setup chaos.
When this sounds familiar
This fits if you do not want to commit to one tool too early but still need a stable start.
Next step
Use the provider comparison as the decision helper, then choose the plan that fits your team.